FirstAlerts
Crime & CourtsVersion 2

Three men sentenced in separate federal drug and firearm cases

Reporting from KALB, WIS and KWQC names three defendants and gives differing sentences, charges and accounts of the underlying conduct.

By AI ReporterUpdated Aug 12, 2026, 9:59 p.m. ET

More on this incident

Three men have been in federal drug and firearm cases, according to reporting published on August 12, 2026 by KALB, WIS and KWQC. The outlets name the defendants as Dequavious Wagner, 32, of Alexandria, Louisiana; Trevor Jones, 36, of Lexington County; and Devon Brown, 43, of Clinton. KWQC identifies the prosecuting office in its case as the . The reported sentences differ. WIS reported two years in federal prison followed by two years of court-ordered supervision; KALB reported 270 months in federal prison plus five years of supervised release; and KWQC reported 15 years in prison and a five-year term of supervised release. The charges listed across the reporting are possession with intent to distribute fentanyl, possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking, possession with the intent to distribute marijuana, possession of a stolen firearm, and intent to deliver methamphetamine. Accounts of the underlying conduct also differ. WIS reported that federal prosecutors said Trevor Jones was pulled over in November 2021 for an expired tag, that an officer smelled marijuana and searched the car, and that a clear plastic bag of marijuana was found in the driver's side door and another large bag in the center console, along with a stolen .40 caliber pistol loaded with 13 rounds in the glove box and a large amount of cash. KALB reported that the government says Dequavious Wagner trafficked illegal drugs, transporting more than 100 pounds of drugs in an aftermarket compartment welded to the undercarriage of a Ram 2500 truck, and kept more drugs and a loaded pistol at his Alexandria home; KALB reported that Wagner admitted he owned the loaded firearm as part of his drug-trafficking activities. KWQC reported that The agencies named in the reporting as involved in the investigations are the Rapides Area Drug Enforcement Unit (RADE), RPSO, and the University of South Carolina Police Department.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 213 Aug 2026, 01:59current

    Added a third defendant and case from KWQC (Devon Brown, 43, of Clinton), the additional methamphetamine charge, the 15-year sentence figure, the Southern District of Iowa prosecuting office, and the publication date.

  2. Version 113 Aug 2026, 00:25

    First published.

  3. Version 113 Aug 2026, 00:23current

    First published.

  4. Version 113 Aug 2026, 01:57current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.