FirstAlerts
Crime & Courts

Nick Reiner Charged With Murder in Deaths of Parents Rob and Michele Reiner

The 32-year-old faces two counts of murder with special circumstance allegations, including lying in wait. He has not been tried, has entered no plea on the public record, and is presumed innocent; the case is unresolved.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 13, 2026, 2:09 a.m. ET

More on this incident

Nick Reiner, 32, has been with two counts of murder in the deaths of his parents, filmmaker and director Rob Reiner and Michele Reiner, according to ARY News, The Bone and KJLH Radio. The charges are allegations that have not been tested in court. Reiner has not been tried and is presumed innocent unless and until he is proven guilty. Nothing in the available record shows how he has responded to the charges, and the matter remains undecided. Reiner was by the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office, according to KJLH Radio. The counts carry special circumstance allegations of multiple murders and of murder by means of lying in wait, along with a special allegation that he used a dangerous and deadly weapon, a knife, as reported by ARY News, The Bone and KJLH Radio. Accounts of the alleged conduct differ in their detail, and no single version is better supported than the others. ARY News reported that prosecutors allege Reiner murdered his parents, filmmaker and actor Rob Reiner and his wife Michele Reiner, whose bodies were discovered at their Brentwood home in December, and that the indictment adds a special circumstance allegation of "lying in wait." The Bone reported that prosecutors allege he murdered them by means of lying in wait, using a knife, and that Rob and Michele Reiner were found stabbed to death in their Brentwood home on Dec. 14, 2025. KJLH Radio reported that prosecutors allege he murdered them by means of lying in wait, stabbing them at their Brentwood home, and that he is alleged to have used a dangerous and deadly weapon, a knife. On the potential penalty, The Bone and KJLH Radio reported that if convicted as , Reiner faces death or life in state prison without the possibility of parole; ARY News reported that the charges . Those outcomes would apply only in the event of a conviction, which has not occurred. The case has not been resolved. Any reader coming to this account later should treat the charges as pending and untested.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 313 Aug 2026, 14:53current

    Added bignewsnetwork.com as a fourth cited outlet, including its account of the bodies being found at the Brentwood home last December and its framing of the death-penalty/life-without-parole exposure.

  2. Version 213 Aug 2026, 06:13

    Added an explicit presumption-of-innocence and no-trial statement to the dek and as a dedicated second paragraph, and noted that the cited reports contain no defense response and no presumption line. Headline changed from "Indicted" to "Charged With" to match the charging stage. Added a sentence clarifying that the sentencing exposure applies only upon conviction. All charge language, the conflicting conduct accounts with their attributions, and both statutory-maximum formulations are unchanged and still attributed as in the fact set.

  3. Version 113 Aug 2026, 01:24

    First published.

  4. Version 113 Aug 2026, 00:50

    First published.

  5. Version 113 Aug 2026, 06:09current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.