FirstAlerts

Case Undecided: Man, 28, Federally Charged in 2024 Fire at Tallahassee's Historic Exchange Bank Building

Prosecutors in the Northern District of Florida have charged Ian Nathaniel Grice with arson and interstate travel in aid of a racketeering enterprise, according to WCTV. The case is open and unresolved — no plea, trial, verdict or sentence is recorded — and Grice is presumed innocent.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 13, 2026, 8:07 p.m. ET
**This is an open case with no outcome.** A 28-year-old man has been federally in connection with a January 2024 fire at a downtown Tallahassee building that houses the historic Exchange Bank, WCTV reported. The case is at the charging stage and has not been decided. The outlet identified the defendant as Ian Nathaniel Grice and said the charges were announced by the . According to WCTV, Grice is with arson and with interstate travel in aid of a racketeering enterprise. The station reported that Grice allegedly set fire on Jan. 14, 2024 to the building at 201 South Monroe Street in Tallahassee, where the historic Exchange Bank is located, and that court documents state the building was being used for interstate commerce at the time of the arson. A charge is an allegation, not a finding of guilt. Grice has not been tried on either count, no court has weighed the evidence against him, and he is presumed innocent unless and until he is proven guilty. WCTV reported the statutory penalties as "." Those figures describe what the counts carry on conviction. No conviction has been entered in this case and no sentence has been imposed. The agencies WCTV listed as investigating are the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Tallahassee Police Department, the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, and the Florida Department of Financial Services and its Division of Investigative and Forensic Services. **Status: unresolved.** WCTV's report placed the case at the charging stage and did not include a response from Grice or a defense attorney, any plea, or scheduled court dates. No plea, trial date, verdict, dismissal, acquittal or sentence has been reported. Nothing published as of this writing records an outcome of any kind, and a reader coming to this account later should not assume one was reached: the case was still undecided when this was written, and this story has not been updated with a resolution.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 114 Aug 2026, 00:07current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.