FirstAlerts

USGS Assigns Yellow Impact Level to Magnitude 5.2 Earthquake Near Otura, Spain

The United States Geological Survey estimates that some casualties and localised damage are possible following the shallow August 14 quake.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 15, 2026, 11:55 a.m. ET
Developing

Earthquake records are revised. Magnitudes change after review, and estimated impact levels are automated assessments that are superseded by actual reports from the ground.

More on this incident

Official records from have designated the estimated impact level as following a magnitude near Otura, Spain. The level indicates that . The occurred on August 14, 2026, , at a depth of km. USGS records list an instrument intensity of , a community intensity of , and felt reports. Official records also note that a tsunami evaluation was not flagged.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 115 Aug 2026, 15:55current

    First published.

  2. Version 115 Aug 2026, 15:43current

    First published.

  3. Version 115 Aug 2026, 15:56current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.