Pilot Killed in Cirrus Crash West of Bend, Oregon; Cause Not Determined
KTVZ, KPTV and NBC16 each report one death in the August 4, 2026 crash near Bull Creek, with the NTSB and FAA investigating.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Terrain elevation
- 3,632 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 2.1 miles WNW of Pilot Butte Airport (8OR5)
Sources
- New Information: One Person Dead Following Plane Crash in Deschutes Countyktvz.com
- Pilot dies in plane crash west of Bendkptv.com
- Aircraft crashes west of Bend; pilot deadnbc16.com
- BREAKING NEWS: Pilot identified in deadly plane crash, Aircraft brought down intentionally according to investigatorsktvz.com
- Developing Story: Pilot killed in plane crash indicted by Deschutes Grand Jury hours before incidentktvz.com
- Developing Story: Pilot killed in plane crash indicted by Deschutes Grand Jury hours before incidentktvz.com
- Pilot killed in plane crash indicted by Deschutes County Grand Jury hours before incident, case dismissed following deathktvz.com
Revision history
- Version 77 Aug 2026, 14:56current
No new facts; headline and dek revised and attribution wording tightened.
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 12:49
Condensed the court-record paragraph; no new facts added.
- Version 56 Aug 2026, 23:36
Added KTVZ report that Deschutes County Circuit Court records show the criminal case against the pilot was dismissed as of August 6, and updated the headline accordingly.
- Version 26 Aug 2026, 11:22current
Corrected the bearings for the nearby aerodromes to match the reference data and clarified that the aircraft identity and occupant count are absent from the available material.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 05:06
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.