Two killed in small plane crash near Bogalusa, Louisiana; cause undetermined
The Washington Parish Sheriff's Office identified those killed as a married couple from Seguin, Texas, as the NTSB said the airplane impacted terrain under unknown circumstances shortly after takeoff.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Terrain elevation
- 102 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 1.8 miles SSE of George R Carr Memorial Air Field (KBXA/BXA)
Sources
- Married couple from Texas dead after small plane crashes near Bogalusa airportwbrz.com
- Texas couple killed in small plane crash near Bogalusa airportkalb.com
- 2 killed after plane crashes near Bogalusa airport, Sheriff’s Office saysnola.com
- Married couple from Texas dead after small plane crashes near Bogalusa airportwbrz.com
- Seguin couple killed in Louisiana plane crashseguintoday.com
- Seguin couple killed in Louisiana plane crashseguintoday.com
- Texas couple killed in small plane crash near Bogalusa airportfox8live.com
- Texas couple killed in small plane crash near Bogalusa airportkalb.com
- Texas couple killed in small plane crash near Bogalusa airportkplctv.com
- Texas couple killed in small plane crash near Bogalusa airportksla.com
- Texas couple killed in small plane crash near Bogalusa airportwdam.com
- Texas husband, wife identified as victims in deadly Bogalusa plane crash wdsu.com
- Texas couple killed in small plane crash near Bogalusa airportwlox.com
- Two killed in crash of small plane at Louisiana airfieldyahoo.com
Revision history
- Version 138 Aug 2026, 06:33current
Resolved WDSU's "by Friday" deadline for the preliminary FAA report to the calendar date August 7, 2026.
- Version 128 Aug 2026, 06:28
Added NOLA.com's reporting: its "just before 10:50 a.m." timing, the FAA cause investigation per the Sheriff's Office, airport description (city-owned, 401 Walker Street, runway over 5,000 feet) and that airport management declined to comment.
- Version 118 Aug 2026, 06:24
Added WBRZ attribution for the date, time, two aboard and the sheriff's office statement that the FAA is investigating the cause, plus the request for the public to avoid the area.
- Version 108 Aug 2026, 02:18
Added Seguin Today reporting: NTSB has taken over the investigation, firefighters cut through a locked gate, sheriff's note that small aircraft often stop for fuel, and its "Beech H35" and 10:48 a.m. figures.
- Version 98 Aug 2026, 00:22
Added KSLA to the outlets supporting the aircraft type, date, time and NTSB preliminary statement, and noted the divergence between outlets on how the investigation was described.
- Version 87 Aug 2026, 14:47
Corrected the weather observation to the reference reading (scattered cloud at 2,300 ft, 90°F, 13 minutes from the reported time) and noted the aircraft has not been identified by registration.
- Version 77 Aug 2026, 01:51
Added WDAM to the outlets corroborating the aircraft type, date, time and NTSB preliminary statement.
- Version 67 Aug 2026, 01:37
Added KALB as a corroborating source for the aircraft type, date, time and NTSB preliminary statement.
- Version 56 Aug 2026, 23:36
Corrected weather reading (1,900 ft cloud, 88°F, 53 minutes from reported time), led with the better-supported Beech H-35 and August 6, 2026 details, added KPLC attribution and NTSB investigator arrival/aircraft recovery details.
- Version 46 Aug 2026, 22:22
Added FOX 8 reporting to the aircraft-type, date, time and investigation attributions, and led with the better-supported 10:48 a.m. time.
- Version 36 Aug 2026, 21:40
Added WLOX reporting: competing Beech H-35 type and August 6, 2026 date, NTSB investigator en route, and the NTSB witness email appeal.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.