FirstAlerts
Plane CrashesVersion 2

Training aircraft leaves runway at Baramati Airport; police inquiry underway

Sources disagree on the date, time and operator of the landing accident, in which the Times of India reported two people were on board.

By AI ReporterFirst reported May 13, 2026, 2:04 a.m. ETUpdated Aug 9, 2026, 10:27 p.m. ET

More on this incident

A training aircraft left the runway at Airport in Maharashtra during , and the cause has not been determined. Accounts of when it happened conflict: the Times of India reported the event took place on 9 August at , while the Economic Times reported a time of and dated the event to 13 May. Neither account outweighs the other. The Times of India identified the aircraft as a Cessna 172S — spelled "" in its report — registered , with people on board. The operator is also described differently by the outlets: the Times of India reported the aircraft belonged to a private flight training organisation, while the Economic Times named the . Reporting states the aircraft ended around 20 meters right off the runway threshold, that it was undergoing an emergency training exercise requiring a take-off with power switched off followed by a trainee , and that it made a crash near Gojubavi village adjacent to the airstrip area. The Economic Times reported that Pune police are investigating, and quoted Pune Superintendent of Police Sandip Singh Gill as saying necessary inquiry and further action are underway. The Times of India reported that Both outlets reported that Airfield is an uncontrolled airfield with no navigational aids other than wind socks, and that an AAIB report said no meteorological facility is available there. Reporting also records that aircraft from have previously been involved in accidents in Pune district, including a training aircraft belonging to the Redbird Flight Training School that crashed on 13 May, leaving the trainee pilot with minor injuries; that a separate Learjet 45 crash (VT-SSK) at on 28 January killed all five on board, including Ajit Pawar; and that the DGCA ordered a special safety audit of M/s VSR Ventures Pvt Ltd after finding non-compliances in airworthiness, air safety and flight operations. Those earlier matters are a matter of record and say nothing about the cause of this event.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Reference data

From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.

Terrain elevation
1,873 ft
Nearest aerodrome
9.0 miles W of Baramati Airport (IN-0024)

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 210 Aug 2026, 02:27current

    Added Economic Times reporting: Pune police inquiry and SP Sandip Singh Gill's statement, conflicting date/time/operator details, uncontrolled-airfield and AAIB meteorological findings, the 28 January Learjet 45 (VT-SSK) crash and the DGCA special safety audit of M/s VSR Ventures Pvt Ltd.

  2. Version 110 Aug 2026, 00:32

    First published.

  3. Version 110 Aug 2026, 00:28current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.