Two Firefighting Crew Killed in Helicopter Collision Near Psatha, Greece
Aerotime reported that two Bell helicopters operated by McDermott Aviation collided on August 3, 2026, killing a Danish pilot and a Greek fire service liaison officer.
More on this incident
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Registration
- N511EV
- Type
- Bell 214ST — single-engine turboprop helicopter
- Engines
- AMA/EXPR UNKNOWN ENG
- Built
- 1982-01-01 (44 years old)
- Registered owner
- Bank Of Utah TrusteeThe owner of record is not necessarily the operator, the pilot, or otherwise connected to the flight.
- Terrain elevation
- 13 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 7.6 miles NW of Dounis Airfield (GR-0016)
Sources
Revision history
- Version 87 Aug 2026, 15:35current
Minor wording clarifications to the type-record sentence and the derived-registration caveat; no new facts.
- Version 75 Aug 2026, 20:10
Added the unconfirmed volunteer-database registration N511EV with its registry details, the registered owner of record and trustee background, the owner's other NTSB cases and the Bell 214ST type record; dropped the geographic paragraph.
- Version 64 Aug 2026, 23:23
Corrected the operator fleet detail to the registry models and countries of registration now on record (Australia and Papua New Guinea), removing the previously listed 214 ST, 206L and US registrations.
- Version 54 Aug 2026, 20:33
Removed the developing-situation caveat now that the event record is published; no factual changes.
- Version 44 Aug 2026, 20:32
Replaced the claim that the aircraft identities were unknowable with registry-record detail on McDermott Aviation's fleet, noting it is not an identification of the aircraft involved.
- Version 34 Aug 2026, 20:09current
Added a note that neither helicopter's registration is in the available material and explained why no tail number can be matched.
- Version 27 Aug 2026, 15:35current
Restructured to lead with the collision, casualties and open investigation rather than the unconfirmed registration; added location reference data and clearer labelling of the tail number as unconfirmed.
- Version 24 Aug 2026, 20:04
Corrected the geographic description of the site relative to nearby aerodromes and added the Perneri Airfield distance from reference data.
- Version 14 Aug 2026, 17:09
First published.
- Version 15 Aug 2026, 20:13
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.