Two soldiers killed in US Army Apache helicopter crash near Salado, Texas
The AH-64 was based at Fort Hood and crashed on 12 August 2026, sparking a wildfire; the cause has not been determined and Fort Hood's criminal investigation division is leading the inquiry.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Terrain elevation
- 614 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 1.8 miles N of Salado Airport (73TA)
Sources
- 2 pilots dead after military helicopter slams into Central Texas field and catches firekrdo.com
- 2 pilots dead after military helicopter slams into Central Texas field and catches firecbs58.com
- 2 pilots dead after military helicopter slams into Central Texas field and catches fire | CNNcnn.com
- US Army's Apache Attack Helicopter Crashes in Texas Field, Killing Two Crew Members Aboardibtimes.co.uk
- 2 Soldiers Are Dead After a Military Helicopter Crashes in Texas, Sparking a Firenbcnews.com
- Two soldiers are dead after a military helicopter crashes in Texas, sparking a firenbcnews.com
- US army helicopter crashes in Texas, killing two people and sparking wildfiretheguardian.com
Revision history
- Version 713 Aug 2026, 13:38current
Repaired garbled text in the investigation paragraph, corrected the operator fleet count to two, and added CNN's later fire figure (155 acres, 85% contained at 7 p.m.), Coleman's description of the crash into a field, and Abbott's request for prayers.
- Version 613 Aug 2026, 07:22
Added KRDO to attributions for time, casualties and souls on board; corrected operator fleet count to three aircraft on the registry.
- Version 513 Aug 2026, 04:39
Corrected operator fleet count from three to one, led with the best-supported 1:35 p.m. time, added CNN attribution, the KILE weather observation and Governor Abbott's condolences.
- Version 413 Aug 2026, 03:58
Added CBS 58 reporting: third time figure (around 1:35 p.m.), fire size of about 100 acres and 45% containment by 5 p.m., crash site less than 20 miles from Fort Hood, and Bell County sheriff's spokesperson Cliff Coleman's statement that no structures or people were struck.
- Version 313 Aug 2026, 02:30
Added NBC News corroboration of the time and of no injuries, the transport of the two soldiers to Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center and withholding of names, the aircraft's Fort Hood basing, and updated the registry fleet count from one to three aircraft.
- Version 213 Aug 2026, 01:57
Added IBTimes details (time shortly after 1.30pm local, both dead were crew, US Army as operator, origin/destination undetermined, no residential damage), noted the differing accounts of the investigation's state, added that the aircraft is unidentified with operator registry count, and corrected the direction of the nearby aerodromes relative to Salado.
- Version 113 Aug 2026, 01:35
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.