Two Pilots Killed in Helicopter Crash on Utah Wildfire Assignment
A Sikorsky S-64 Skycrane working the Widemouth 2 Fire near Richfield, Utah, went down on 7 August 2026; the cause has not been determined.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Reference data
From aircraft and geographic registries, not from the news sources. Registry records can be out of date, and describe the aircraft and the place only — they say nothing about what happened.
- Terrain elevation
- 846 ft
- Nearest aerodrome
- 3.2 miles W of Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport / Wold–Chamberlain Field (KMSP/MSP)
Sources
- Utah wildfire: 2 helicopter pilots confirmed dead after crash while battling blazetimesofindia.indiatimes.com
- 2 Pilots Killed in Helicopter Crash While Fighting Utah Wildfireflyingmag.com
- Two Killed in S-64 Skycrane Accident Fighting Utah Wildfireavweb.com
- Two pilots killed in S-64 Skycrane crash in Utahaerotime.aero
- California pilot dies in helicopter crash battling massive Utah wildfirenypost.com
Revision history
- Version 412 Aug 2026, 00:48current
Added second pilot's name (Chris Andersen) and Elliott's age, the New York Post's differing aircraft description, updated fire size and containment figures, and the reported two-minute/3-mile flight and seven aircraft on the fire.
- Version 311 Aug 2026, 02:32
Added AVweb and AeroTime reporting: crew and on-board figures, 10:40 a.m. time accounts, pilot named as Miles Elliott, recovery of remains on 8 August, fire size and lightning origin, FAA among investigators, and the conflicting accounts of the investigation's status.
- Version 211 Aug 2026, 00:24
Corrected operator registry holdings from eight aircraft to one; added Flying Magazine attribution, the conflicting reported times (Friday morning vs about 10 a.m. MDT) and that the helicopter was in cruise en route to the fire.
- Version 110 Aug 2026, 01:32
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.