FirstAlerts
Recalls & Safety Alerts

Hampton Grocers Expands Recall of Lacnola Lactation Granola Over Salmonella Risk

Hampton Grocers has expanded its recall of Lacnola Lactation Granola packaged in pink 8-ounce pouches due to potential Salmonella contamination.

3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 15, 2026, 8:25 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 15, 2026, 1:03 p.m. ETWritten Aug 15, 2026, 9:12 p.m. ET
Developing

This recall is open. The agency updates its record as an action is expanded, reclassified or terminated, and this page is rewritten when it does.

An expanded recall for Lacnola Lactation Granola now covers products marked with an expiration date of either Oct. 21, 2026, or Feb. 13, 2027, according to reporting by KMVT, KWCH, and KWTX. The FDA-announced recall involves , from firm . The recall was issued because the granola . KMVT and KWTX reported that a sample of the organic moringa powder used in the granola tested positive for Salmonella. In the same breath, KWCH reported that . The recalled product was , KMVT, KWCH, and KWTX reported.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 15, 2026, 8:56 p.m. ET

    Hampton Grocers Recalls Lacnola Lactation Granola Over Salmonella Risk

    Hampton Grocers has recalled its Lacnola Lactation Granola because it may be contaminated with Salmonella, according to reports from kmvt.com, kwch.com and kwtx.com. Reporting from kmvt.com and kwtx.com states that a sample of the organic moringa powder used in the granola tested positive for Salmonella; kwch.com reported instead that the company learned from the supplier of the organic moringa powder used in the granola that a sample of the powder had tested positive for Salmonella. No illnesses have been reported, according to kmvt.com, kwch.com and kwtx.com.

    The recall applies to Lacnola Lactation Granola packaged in a pink 8-ounce pouch bearing an expiration date of either Oct. 21, 2026, or Feb. 13, 2027. The product was distributed nationwide online through various retailers, including Amazon, between October 2025 and Aug. 12, 2026, kmvt.com, kwch.com and kwtx.com reported.

    The remedy, as reported by kmvt.com, kwch.com and kwtx.com, reads: "Consumers are advised to throw the product away and contact the place of purchase for a full refund."

    The recall was reported in connection with the FDA, according to kmvt.com, kwch.com and kwtx.com.

  2. Aug 15, 2026, 8:25 p.m. ETFirst report

    Hampton Grocers Recalls Lacnola Lactation Granola Over Salmonella Concerns

    Hampton Grocers is recalling Lacnola Lactation Granola due to potential Salmonella contamination in a developing situation reported by kmvt.com, kwch.com, and kwtx.com citing the FDA. The product is packaged in a pink 8-ounce pouch under the Lacnola brand name, with an expiration date of either Oct. 21, 2026, or Feb. 13, 2027.

    According to kmvt.com and kwtx.com, a sample of the organic moringa powder used in the granola tested positive for Salmonella, whereas kwch.com reported that the company learned from the supplier of the organic moringa powder that a sample of the powder had tested positive for Salmonella. The granola was distributed nationwide online through various retailers, including Amazon, between October 2025 and Aug. 12, 2026.

    No illnesses have been reported, according to reports from kmvt.com, kwch.com, and kwtx.com. Consumers are advised to throw the product away and contact the place of purchase for a full refund.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 116 Aug 2026, 01:12current

    First published.

  2. Version 116 Aug 2026, 00:25current

    First published.

  3. Version 116 Aug 2026, 00:56current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.