FDA Correction Alert on Medline Kits Now Lists 16 Kit Codes Containing Flexicare BritePro Solo
The agency's notice, in its most serious recall class, now covers a longer list of Medline convenience kit codes and lot numbers whose laryngoscope component may fail to illuminate.
By AI ReporterFirst reported Nov 21, 2025, 12:00 a.m. ETWritten Aug 7, 2026, 8:47 p.m. ET
The FDA's correction alert covering Medline convenience kits that contain the Flexicare BritePro Solo laryngoscope now lists a wider set of affected kit codes and lot numbers than earlier notices. According to the FDA, is updating the use instructions for kits containing the previously recalled component because the light does not illuminate as intended. The action was initiated on July 25, 2025, and
The products are . The FDA states that if the light malfunctions, it may prevent effective illumination of the patient airway, and that use of affected product may cause serious adverse health consequences, including delay in treatment or requiring intubation using a different device and possibly death. The remedy given by the agency is to
The full current list of identifying codes in the FDA notice, with device identifiers and lot numbers as recorded: ACC010381C — 10193489922127 (EA), 40193489922128 (CS) — lots 21LDA450, 21KDA979, 21JDB271, 21LDA608; ACC010532 — 10193489902358 (EA), 40193489902359 (CS) — lot 21FDA234; ACC010671 — 10195327351090 (EA), 40195327351091 (CS) — lot 23EDC536; ACC010728 — UDI/DI 10195327506544 (EA), 40195327506545 (CS) — lots 24EDC276, 23KDC368, 23KDB032; ACC010369B — 10193489777512 (EA) 40193489777513(CA) — lots 21DDA738, 21CDA614, 21BDA717; ACC010379A — 10193489777529 (EA) 40193489777520(CA) — lots 21BDB738, 21BDB493; ACC010392 — 10193489218053 (EA) 40193489218054(CA) — lots 24JDA206, 21HDB930, 21HDA284, 21EDB901, 21EDB869, 21EDB805; ACC010467A — 10193489834550 (EA) 40193489834551(CA) — lot 21EDA887; ACC010469 — 10193489414677 (EA) 40193489414678(CA) — lots 22BDA430, 21KDA741, 21CDA522, 21BDA753; ACC010480 — 10193489499933 (EA) 40193489499934(CA) — lots 21HDA876, 21FDB951, 21FDB019, 21EDA065, 21CDB872, 21BDB094; ACC010480A — 10195327009366 (EA) 40195327009367(CA) — lot 21JDB163; ACC010540 — 10193489977547 (EA) 40193489977548(CA) — lot 21IDC276; ACC010593A — 10195327168995 (EA) 40195327168996(CA) — lot 22EDB290; ACC010593B — 10195327195472 (EA) 40195327195473(CA) — lot 22FDB947; DYNDA1847A — 10193489481259 (EA) 40193489481250(CA) — lots 21FBG208, 21CBL507; and DYNJAA245A — 10193489804584 (EA) 40193489804585(CA) — lots 21LBV006, 21IBV349, 21HBT154, 21DBI703, 21CBN261.
On injuries, the FDA notice states: "" The date as printed in the record predates the July 25, 2025 initiation date, and the notice does not explain the discrepancy.
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.