FirstAlerts

Two Killed, Four Injured in Shooting at Louisville's Chickasaw Park

Louisville Metro Police said officers found two people dead after a call reporting multiple people shot at the park on the night of April 15.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Apr 16, 2023, 12:20 a.m. ETWritten Aug 7, 2026, 11:37 p.m. ET
people were killed and were injured in a shooting at in , , on Saturday, April 15, said, according to ABC News. Metro Police said they received a call at about 9 p.m. reporting that multiple people had been shot at the park. people were dead at the scene when officers arrived, Humphrey said. others were injured, according to the figures he gave. Officials have not released the identities of those killed or injured. Police have not said what led to the shooting, and no cause or motive has been established. The investigation is developing and figures may be revised. Mayor Craig Greenberg said, "this is not who we are," adding that "the love and support and strength that we've seen all week long throughout the city continues to bring us together and move us towards a safer city, a stronger city and a healthier city."

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 18 Aug 2026, 03:37current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.