FirstAlerts

Cook County sheriff names Arlington Heights man charged in child sexual abuse material case

Cook County Sheriff Thomas J. Dart identified the man charged with dissemination and possession of child sexual abuse material following a search warrant executed on June 16.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Jun 19, 2026, 3:00 p.m. ETWritten Aug 15, 2026, 5:33 p.m. ET

More on this incident

Cook County Sheriff Thomas J. Dart and the Cook County Sheriff's Office have named the man charged in the case as . The Sheriff's Office said he was taken into custody on June 17 and that the Cook County State's Attorney's Office approved felony charges of Dissemination and Possession of Child Sexual Abuse Material the same day. According to the Sheriff's Office, Cook County Sheriff's Police Internet Crimes Against Children and Cyber Trafficking units began investigating multiple cybertips regarding uploaded child sexual abuse material files on Dec. 5. Investigators met the man at a North Windsor Drive address in on June 10 and took possession of his cell phone, the Sheriff's Office said, and executed a search warrant on the phone on June 16, finding more than 150 files of explicit images and videos of children. The Sheriff's Office said he was ordered into Cook County Jail custody on June 18 following a first appearance hearing at the Rolling Meadows Courthouse. He remains . The Sheriff's Office listed the incident location as a Jewel grocery store in the 1800 of South Road in . The charges are allegations and have not been tested in court. Cook County Sheriff's Police and the Cook County State's Attorney's Office are the responding agencies.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 115 Aug 2026, 21:26current

    First published.

  2. Version 115 Aug 2026, 21:33current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.