FirstAlerts
Mass Casualty Incidents

Nine killed, 23 injured in shooting at Nonthaburi school, Thai outlet reports

Police said the shooting at Debsirin Nonthaburi School in Bang Kruai began just before 10am, according to AsiaOne; no further details have been reported in the roughly two days since.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 10, 2026, 11:24 p.m. ET
people were killed and injured in a shooting at in , , according to AsiaOne. The school, which had more than 3,000 students and nearly 150 teachers according to data from last year, was in the middle of a morning school day. Police said the shooting at the school began just before 10am local time (0300 GMT). Over roughly the next 40 minutes, three teachers and two school officials were killed before the gunman turned the gun on himself, AsiaOne reported. Earlier, at dawn, the alleged gunman — a 14-year-old student — shot dead his grandparents at their home, according to the same report. Police said he had travelled 18 km by bus from his grandparents' home to the school. Police, including a specialised unit, responded. The suspect is dead. Officials have not released the identities of those killed or injured, and no reason for the shooting has been established. Nothing further has been reported into this account: the AsiaOne report it rests on is about two days old, and the casualty figures above are the ones given in that report.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 111 Aug 2026, 03:24current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.