FirstAlerts

Six killed in shooting at school in Nonthaburi province, Thailand

Police said 15 people were wounded in the August 7 shooting at Debsirin Nonthaburi School, outside Bangkok, and that the gunman is dead.

By AI ReporterUpdated Aug 7, 2026, 11:11 a.m. ET
people were killed in a shooting at , a high school outside Bangkok in , on August 7, 2026, according to reporting by the Winnipeg Free Press, the Brandon Sun and SBS. Thai national police spokesperson Trairong Phiwphan said people were wounded, as reported by DW, the Winnipeg Free Press and the Brandon Sun; the same figure of injured was attributed to by The Irish Times and was also reported by SBS. Early counts are commonly revised. Accounts of the setting differ. DW reported that it was a school day at the school, with students, teachers and other workers present who were evacuated. The Winnipeg Free Press reported that students were at , a high school outside Bangkok in . Sources also described the location at differing levels of detail: DW, the Winnipeg Free Press and the Brandon Sun identified the , SBS the , and The Irish Times the of . The Royal , police officers, rescue workers and emergency doctors responded. About an hour after the shooting, people stood outside the school comforting one another while police and first responders walked around inside, according to The Canadian Press, as carried by the Winnipeg Free Press and the Brandon Sun. Police said the gunman is dead. The Irish Times reported saying the gunman shot himself; DW reported police saying he killed himself. Officials have not released the identities of those killed or wounded. Police have not said what led to the shooting, and no motive has been established. Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said: "It's such a terrible incident. It should never have happened. How could this happen in our country?", as reported by The Irish Times and DW. He was also quoted as saying: "It's a terrible tragedy. This should never have happened." If you or someone you know is struggling, support is available. In many countries, local crisis lines and emergency services can be reached at any hour; contact your national suicide prevention or mental health helpline.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 27 Aug 2026, 15:11current

    Added the prime minister's second recorded quote, tightened attribution of the casualty figures and location-granularity disagreement; no new official facts.

  2. Version 17 Aug 2026, 13:33

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.