FirstAlerts

Eight killed in shootings at Atlanta-area massage businesses; victims' names released

Local officials released the full names of all eight people killed in the 16 March attack, and the sheriff's office spokesman who spoke about the case has been removed from that role.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Mar 19, 2021, 11:45 a.m. ETWritten Aug 12, 2026, 1:24 a.m. ET
people were killed in shootings at Atlanta-area massage businesses on Tuesday, 16 March 2021, according to reporting by the BBC and The New Yorker. The two outlets describe the location differently: the BBC reported that the attack targeted , while The New Yorker referred to . Neither account outweighs the other, so both are given here. is in , according to the BBC. On Friday, local officials released the full names of all victims of the attack, according to both outlets. The individual names are not carried in this report. The responding agencies named in reporting are the Sheriff's Office and the sheriff's office in Cherokee County. A suspect is , The New Yorker reported. , identified the suspect as , the BBC reported. On Wednesday, the suspect was charged with counts of murder and told investigators he did not have a racial motive. Speaking about the suspect, Captain Baker, a spokesman for the sheriff's office in Cherokee County, said: "He apparently has an issue, what he considers a sex addiction," and also described it as "a really bad day." On Thursday night, it was announced that Baker had been removed as a spokesman on the case, according to both outlets. Beyond those statements, investigators have not established a motive on the record. President Joe Biden said: "Hate can have no safe harbour in America. It has to stop," and added: "It's on all of us, all of us together, to make it stop." This remains a developing story. Details may change as officials release further information.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 112 Aug 2026, 05:24current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.