Two custodians found shot dead inside Chicago elementary school, ABC News reports
Chicago police said two adults were found unresponsive inside Mark Twain Elementary School on the afternoon of Aug. 10; no cause has been determined.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- 2 custodians dead in possible murder-suicide at Chicago elementary schoolfoxnews.com
- 2 custodians found shot dead inside Chicago elementary school, police sayabcnews.com
- Chicago elementary school shooting leaves 2 custodians dead, police sayfox10phoenix.com
- Chicago elementary school shooting leaves 2 custodians dead, police sayfox26houston.com
- Chicago elementary school shooting leaves 2 custodians dead, police sayfox5atlanta.com
- Chicago elementary school shooting leaves 2 custodians dead, police sayfox5dc.com
- Chicago elementary school shooting leaves 2 custodians dead, police sayfox7austin.com
- Chicago school shooting leaves 2 dead at Mark Twain Elementary Schoolthenews.com.pk
- 2 killed in Chicago elementary shootingwndu.com
Revision history
- Version 312 Aug 2026, 18:21
Added Fox News's competing count of one killed, police-stated ages of the two people found unresponsive, the reported self-inflicted death and deceased-suspect account, the principal's quotes, and the 988 crisis line.
- Version 212 Aug 2026, 02:09current
Added that the two killed were school custodians per ABC News' WLS, that Chicago police said two adults were found unresponsive inside, and the principal's statement that no students were in the building.
- Version 112 Aug 2026, 01:38
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.