FirstAlerts

DHS employee Lauren Bullis killed while walking her dog in Atlanta

A suspect is in custody after the April 13 attack, which the Department of Homeland Security says killed one of its Office of Inspector General employees; the investigation is developing.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Apr 15, 2026, 7:35 p.m. ETWritten Aug 12, 2026, 1:24 a.m. ET
Lauren Bullis, an employee of the Department of Homeland Security, was killed in on April 13, 2026, while she was walking her dog. said she was attacked at random. In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security said: "In every role she held, Lauren exemplified dedication to the OIG mission." Police said the attack took place about four hours after earlier shootings in the area, according to ABC affiliate WSB. Police are among the agencies responding. Officials have given the location only as , and no further detail on where in the the attack occurred has been released. A suspect is . Mullin said the man now accused in Bullis's death, , "possesses a prior criminal record that includes convictions for sexual battery, battery against a police officer, obstruction, and assault with a deadly weapon, vandalism and now stands accused of murdering @DHSgov employee Lauren Bullis by shooting and stabbing her while she walked her dog." Authorities have not released a total number of people killed or wounded in the earlier Atlanta-area shootings, and no official has stated a motive. The sequence of events remains under investigation.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 112 Aug 2026, 05:24current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.