FirstAlerts

Seven Killed in Shooting at School and Home in Thailand's Nonthaburi Province

Asian Image reported that a 14-year-old schoolboy opened fire at Debsirin Nonthaburi School on Friday morning before taking his own life; the situation is still developing.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 9, 2026, 8:54 p.m. ET
Students and staff were at , in north-west of Bangkok, when a 14-year-old schoolboy opened fire at around 10am local time (4am BST) on Friday, according to reporting by Asian Image. The outlet reported that at least people were killed and injured. Thailand's health ministry gave a figure of people remaining in hospital, of them critical, Asian Image reported. Officials said the boy also appeared to have killed his two grandparents at the family home earlier that morning. He , according to the same reporting. By early afternoon, all eight bodies had been collected from Bangkok's Institute of Forensic Medicine, Asian Image reported. Officials have not released the identities of those killed or injured. The events remain under investigation and no cause or motive has been determined. The school said all classes would be suspended between August 10 and 14, and that staff were instructed to work from home during that time. This is a developing story and the figures reported so far may be revised. If you or someone you know is struggling, the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is available 24 hours a day: call or text 988.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 110 Aug 2026, 00:54current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.