FirstAlerts

Seven killed in shooting at school and home in Nonthaburi province, Thailand

Relatives collected eight bodies from a Bangkok forensic institute on Saturday afternoon after Friday morning's attack at Debsirin Nonthaburi School and at a family home. The most recent account available dates from Saturday.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 10, 2026, 12:13 a.m. ET
people were killed and injured in a shooting at and at a home in Nonthaburi province, outside Bangkok, the Gazette reported, citing figures as of . The health ministry gave the figures for those taken to hospital, according to the same report. The shooting began at the school at around 10am local time (4am BST) on Friday, according to the report. Officials said the 14-year-old who opened fire there also appeared to have killed his two grandparents at the family home earlier that morning. The teenager then , the report said. Officials have not released the identities of those killed, and no motive has been stated. Early on afternoon, all eight bodies were collected from Bangkok's Institute of Forensic Medicine by relatives, the Gazette reported. The health ministry and the forensic institute are among the agencies involved in the response. . The account above rests on a single report published on , and no later information has been reported since. Casualty figures compiled in the hours after an attack are often revised, and the totals here are those stated as of . If you or someone you know is struggling, the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is available 24 hours a day: call or text 988.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 110 Aug 2026, 04:13current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.