FirstAlerts

Seven killed in shooting at school in Nonthaburi, Thailand

Sixteen people remain in hospital, seven of them critically, according to the health ministry as reported by london-now.co.uk; the incident remains under investigation and details are still developing.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 9, 2026, 12:24 a.m. ET
people were killed in a shooting at , a high school in province outside Bangkok, on Friday, according to london-now.co.uk. The outlet reported that a 14-year-old schoolboy opened fire at the school at around 10am local time (4am BST) during a school day. Officials said that earlier in the morning the boy appeared to have killed his two grandparents at the family home. people remained in hospital as of , of them in a critical condition, the health ministry said, as reported by london-now.co.uk. Casualty figures in the hours after an attack are frequently revised. Officials have not released the identities of those killed or injured. Early on afternoon, all eight bodies were collected from Bangkok's Institute of Forensic Medicine, london-now.co.uk reported. The outlet reported that the boy . It did not identify him by name. No official account of a motive has been released, and the circumstances have not been determined. . This is a developing story and figures and details may change. If you or someone you know is struggling, the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is available 24 hours a day: call or text 988.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 19 Aug 2026, 04:24current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.