FirstAlerts

Chatham County police name fifth suspect charged in Savannah apartment shooting

The Chatham County Police Department said a fifth person is now in custody in connection with a March 18, 2025 shooting at a Savannah apartment complex that injured five people.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 8, 2026, 2:25 a.m. ET

More on this incident

The has named a fifth suspect charged in connection with a shooting at the in , Ga., and said the suspect is . Police identified the person as . people were injured in the shooting, according to figures stated by the and reported by WJCL. Police said officers responded to the apartment complex at around 12:45 a.m. on March 18, 2025, after multiple reports of shots fired and calls about a shooting. The agencies involved in the response are the , the department's Criminal Investigations Division, the U.S. Marshals Service and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Police have not said what led to the shooting.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 18 Aug 2026, 06:25current

    First published.

  2. Version 18 Aug 2026, 06:25current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.