FirstAlerts

FBI says it did not properly follow up tip weeks before Florida school shooting that killed 17

President Trump criticised the bureau after it acknowledged a 5 January tip about the named suspect in the 14 February attack in Parkland, Florida.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Feb 15, 2018, 7:34 a.m. ETWritten Aug 12, 2026, 4:08 a.m. ET

More on this incident

people were killed in a shooting at a school in , , on February 2018, according to the BBC. The identities of those killed have not been released in the reporting available, and officials have not given a breakdown of the dead or of anyone injured. The FBI has said it received a tip on 5 January about , who has been identified by the bureau as the suspect, and that it did not properly follow the tip up. That admission is the bureau's own account of its handling of the information; no finding has been made connecting it to what happened on February. President Donald Trump responded publicly, saying: "Very sad that the FBI missed all of the many signals sent out by the school shooter. This is not acceptable." He added: "There is no collusion. Get back to the basics and make us all proud." The situation remains developing. Beyond the FBI's statement about the January tip, officials have not set out further detail, and this account is limited to what has been stated on the record.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 212 Aug 2026, 08:24current

    Restructured to lead with the killed and injured and the school community rather than the suspect; FBI tip and naming moved lower.

  2. Version 112 Aug 2026, 08:08current

    First published.

  3. Version 112 Aug 2026, 08:15

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.