FirstAlerts

Family identifies two of five killed in Lake Township, Michigan, shooting

A 13-year-old girl called 911 at around 11:40 a.m. after being shot four times, police and family said, according to the New York Post. The suspect is dead.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 15, 2026, 1:22 p.m. ETWritten Aug 15, 2026, 2:30 p.m. ET
Developing

This is a developing story. Details reported early are provisional and are frequently revised. Where sources disagree, both readings are given.

More on this incident

people were killed in a shooting in , , on August 14, 2026, the New York Post reported, citing police and family. A 13-year-old girl who had been shot four times called 911 at around 11:40 a.m. to alert authorities, according to police and family as reported by the New York Post. Two of the victims have been named. The Everitt family identified them on social media, and David Everitt, Amanda's father, did so on Facebook, as Amanda Everitt, 40, and Eric Everitt, 16. The suspect is dead. The account available here places the shooting no more precisely than the city-level location of , and it does not state a motive or describe how the shooting unfolded beyond the 911 call. The casualty figure of killed, the 911 call and the account of the girl being shot four times are all attributed to police and family in that account.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 115 Aug 2026, 18:18current

    First published.

  2. Version 115 Aug 2026, 18:30current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.