FirstAlerts

Two Brothers, 11 and 20, Killed in Shooting Outside San Antonio Home

Bexar County authorities say the brothers were shot one evening outside their home; a suspect is in custody. The available account does not give a calendar date.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 10, 2026, 10:52 p.m. ET

More on this incident

brothers were shot outside their home in , , one evening and later died, said. Local12.com reported the deaths of the , as stated by Bexar County authorities. The brothers were outside the house at the time; their family had asked the sons to move a vehicle because it was partially blocking the sidewalk. Bexar County authorities released the names of both victims. Maliki Perales, 11, suffered gunshot wounds to his head and torso and died later that same night, according to his father, Andrew Perales, who spoke about his sons. Dravyn Quiroz, 20, died the following morning, his father said. said a man, Daniel Antonio Perez, allegedly crossed the street and shot the brothers. He is . Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar said: "He still had the presence of mind and the culpable mental state to go conceal the weapon somewhere and then go conceal himself somewhere else." Officials have not stated a reason for the shooting, and no motive has been established. The Bexar County Sheriff's Office is the responding agency. The case remains open and details may change as authorities release more information. A note on timing: the account available to this report fixes only the sequence of events — the shooting in the evening, the younger brother's death that night, the older brother's death the next morning — and does not give a calendar date for any of them.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 212 Aug 2026, 08:44

    Added suspect's name and age, arrest details, medical examiner's 8.49pm pronouncement, further sheriff quotes including reported prior mental health crises, conflicting accounts of the setting and name spelling, and the block-versus-city location discrepancy.

  2. Version 111 Aug 2026, 02:52current

    First published.

  3. Version 112 Aug 2026, 01:35current

    First published.

  4. Version 111 Aug 2026, 02:54current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.