One killed, one injured in shooting at East Oakland community resource center
Oakland police said officers responded to shots fired at the Parker Community Resource Center on Ney Avenue just before 9 a.m. on Friday, July 31, 2026.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 87 Aug 2026, 13:14current
No new facts; added headline and standfirst summarizing the officially stated location, time and toll.
- Version 74 Aug 2026, 23:40
No new facts; headline and standfirst added, body unchanged.
- Version 64 Aug 2026, 23:28
No new information from officials; added headline and standfirst and left the reported figures and statements unchanged.
- Version 54 Aug 2026, 23:23
No new official information; headline and standfirst added and wording tightened.
- Version 44 Aug 2026, 22:51
Added headline and standfirst; removed the crisis-resources line, which the fact set does not support.
- Version 34 Aug 2026, 22:48
No new official information; headline and standfirst added and wording tightened, with victim identities still unreleased.
- Version 24 Aug 2026, 20:33
Removed the "still developing" framing now that the incident is no longer active, and added a headline and standfirst; facts and figures unchanged.
- Version 14 Aug 2026, 20:09
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.