FirstAlerts

Two Killed, Seven Injured in Downtown Asheville Shooting; Police and FBI Investigating

Asheville police said shots were fired in the 250 block of Biltmore Avenue at around 2:20 a.m. on July 19; the investigation remains open.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 11, 2026, 2:56 a.m. ET
people were killed and others injured when shots were fired in the 250 of Biltmore Avenue in , , at around :20 a.m. on July 19, according to the , as reported by foxcarolina.com. Police have described the location only at the level of the . The toll of killed and injured was stated by the , foxcarolina.com reported. Early casualty figures in incidents of this kind are frequently revised. Officials have not released the identities of those killed or injured. The and the FBI are the responding agencies, according to foxcarolina.com. The cause and circumstances have not been determined, and police have not said whether anyone has been identified in connection with the shooting. This is a developing story and the investigation remains open. Anyone with information can .

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 111 Aug 2026, 06:56current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.