FirstAlerts

Two dead, four wounded in shooting at Bite of Seattle food festival

One person is in custody and Seattle police say they are still looking for other possible suspects after the July 26 shooting at Seattle Center; the investigation remains open.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Jul 31, 2026, 3:37 p.m. ETWritten Aug 8, 2026, 9:59 p.m. ET
people were killed and others were shot at the Bite of food festival at Center on Sunday, July 26, 2026, according to Fox News Digital. The people at the were attending the food festival when the shooting occurred. One person has been arrested, and one person believed to have been involved has died, according to Fox News Digital's reporting. Officials are looking for other possible suspects and none have been identified. The Police Department is the responding agency. Officials have not released the identities of those killed or wounded. "The ongoing investigation into the Center shooting remains a top priority," said Andre Sayles, the department's deputy chief, who has been named interim police chief. "The men and women of the department continue working tirelessly to identify and arrest anyone responsible. In light of the tragic incident, the Police Department has heard from our community about safety concerns at public gatherings and events." Mayor Katie Wilson announced Sayles's appointment following the resignation of Chief Barnes. "I do not take lightly what it means to make decisions that affect people's safety and their lives," Wilson said. She said she chose Sayles "because he has done this job before and can hit the ground running," adding that he had served as chief of police in Wisconsin "where he led with a community-focused approach that strengthened both public safety and community trust." Of the outgoing chief, Wilson said: "Chief Barnes has served this department and this city with dedication, and I am grateful for his service. The courage and professionalism that the officers of the Police Department showed deserves to be honored." This is a developing story. Police have not said what led to the shooting, and no motive has been established. Casualty figures reported in the early days after an attack are frequently revised.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 19 Aug 2026, 01:59current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.