FirstAlerts

Man shot, woman grazed by bullet in Murfreesboro, Tennessee; suspect in custody

Murfreesboro Police said officers responded to Sevier Street and University Avenue on March 12, where a man was shot multiple times and a woman was grazed by a bullet.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Mar 12, 2021, 9:59 p.m. ETWritten Aug 10, 2026, 11:07 p.m. ET
said officers responded at around 6:15 on March 12, 2021 to Sevier Street and University Avenue in , , where a man had been shot multiple times and a woman had been grazed by a bullet. Police identified the man who was shot as Carlos Vazquez. Officials have not released the identity of the woman who was grazed, and police have not said what condition either person is in. are the responding agency named in the reporting. A suspect is , according to , who identified him as . Police have not stated a motive, and no cause or sequence of events beyond the department's own account has been established. This remains a developing account. The details above are limited to what have stated on the record as reported by NewsChannel 5; further figures or identifications may be released or revised by the department.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 111 Aug 2026, 03:07current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.