FirstAlerts

One dead and four injured in shooting at school in Thailand's Nonthaburi province, police say

Police in Nonthaburi said a shooting at Debsirin Nonthaburi School in Bang Kruai district on Friday, Aug 7, 2026, killed one person and injured four, while other outlets reported higher figures; the situation is still developing.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 7, 2026, 9:50 a.m. ET
A shooting took place at in the Bang Kruai of , on , 2026, according to police and multiple news outlets. Most outlets, including Channel NewsAsia, The Straits Times, CNN, The Guardian, RTÉ, Nikkei Asia, the Otago Daily Times and The Business Times, placed the shooting at the level, in Bang Kruai ; others, including the New York Post, NBC News, Tempo, The Daily Star, Tuoi Tre and AOL, identified the itself, . The Straits Times reported that the school had an enrolment of around 3,100 students and 147 teachers in the 2025 academic year, according to ; Tempo reported that students, teachers and other school workers were on the campus at the time. AOL reported that the situation was active, and figures remain unsettled. Lieutenant Colonel Dechrapee Kongdee, the Nonthaburi provincial police commander, said one person was killed and injured, as reported by CNN, The Guardian, NBC News, the New York Post, The Straits Times, Nikkei Asia, RTÉ, Free Malaysia Today, the Canberra Times, PerthNow, the Otago Daily Times and The Business Times; Free Malaysia Today said he confirmed the casualties to Reuters. Other accounts differ: Tempo reported that Thailand's Ministry of Education confirmed dead and that emergency responders said the injured had risen to around ; The Daily Star reported dead and injured, citing ; AOL reported dead and injured, citing ; and Dunya News reported injured, citing . Channel NewsAsia and the Canberra Times quoted Lieutenant Colonel Pasakorn Chaitawiwong, head of the Plai Bang subdistrict police department, as saying the number of deaths was still unknown. Channel NewsAsia and The Guardian gave the casualty figures as of ; Nikkei Asia timestamped them to . Most outlets dated the shooting to Aug 7, 2026; The Straits Times gave the date as Aug 7, 2025. Officials have not released the identities of those killed or injured. , according to The Guardian; police said the gunman died by suicide, as reported by CNN, Channel NewsAsia, Nikkei Asia, RTÉ, NBC News, Tempo, The Straits Times, the Otago Daily Times, Tuoi Tre and The Business Times, with the Nonthaburi provincial police commander, Dechrapee Kongdee, named as the source in several accounts. The Canberra Times and PerthNow described the wound as self-inflicted and said officials reported the gunman took his own life; the New York Post described it as self-inflicted and characterised by police as suicide. Nearly all outlets, including Channel NewsAsia, the Canberra Times, the New York Post, The Straits Times, CNN, AOL, Free Malaysia Today, PerthNow, The Guardian, RTÉ, Nikkei Asia, the Otago Daily Times, Tuoi Tre, NBC News, The Business Times, Tempo and The Daily Star, reported the suspect as ; the Canberra Times also carried the suspect's status as unknown. Police have not stated a motive, and the circumstances have not been determined. In a Facebook post, Thai police told anyone trapped inside a building to "hide, close everything tightly, and wait for rescue personnel to arrive." The Straits Times reported that parents and members of the public were urged to avoid the area so emergency personnel could carry out their duties, and Tempo reported that the Poh Teck Tung Foundation, a Bangkok-based rescue organisation, urged motorists to clear roads so emergency vehicles could move freely. Police officers, rescue teams and emergency doctors were deployed to the scene, along with the Nonthaburi Provincial Police, the Plai Bang subdistrict police, Thailand's Ministry of Education and the interior ministry. Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said: "It's such a terrible incident. It should never have happened. How could this happen in our country?"

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 17 Aug 2026, 13:50current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.