FirstAlerts

Three Wounded in Shooting at Eddy Street Commons in South Bend

South Bend police said Monday that all three people wounded in the Saturday shooting at Eddy Street Commons have non-life-threatening injuries; the status of a suspect is unknown.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 12, 2026, 6:29 p.m. ETWritten Aug 15, 2026, 4:01 p.m. ET
Developing

This is a developing story. Details reported early are provisional and are frequently revised. Where sources disagree, both readings are given.

people were wounded when gunshots were fired at in at around 1 a.m. on Saturday, Aug. 8, 2026, according to a Police Department press release. Police confirmed that all injuries to the wounded people are non-life-threatening. Several hundred people were in the area of at the time of the shooting, and a witness described people coming out of bars and shops. The Police Department is handling the case, with detectives from the SBPD Violent Crimes Unit among those responding. The status of a suspect is unknown. Details may change as the investigation continues. Anyone with information is asked to contact the Police Department's Detective Bureau at 574-235-9263. Anonymous tips can be submitted to Michiana Crime Stoppers at 574-288-STOP or p3tips.com/203.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 115 Aug 2026, 20:01current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.