FirstAlerts

Death toll in Thai school shooting rises to eight after 12-year-old girl dies

Thailand's health ministry said the girl, wounded in Friday's shooting at a school in Nonthaburi province, died on Saturday.

By AI ReporterUpdated Aug 10, 2026, 11:19 p.m. ET
A 12-year-old girl who was wounded in a shooting at , in province north of Bangkok, died on after being treated at a nearby hospital, said. "Another person has passed away... a 12-year-old girl," the ministry said in a statement, as reported by The Peninsula. The school is named in reporting by the New Zealand Herald, which said officials identified the location at level. The shooting took place on Friday, 7 August 2026. The health ministry gave a death toll of , and Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said more than people were injured, according to The Peninsula, with those figures given as of . The New Zealand Herald also attributed the toll of to . As of evening, 14 people remained in hospital, seven of them in critical condition, The Peninsula reported without attributing the figure to a named official. Police said a 14-year-old boy shot his grandparents before a killing spree at his school north of Bangkok and ultimately turned the gun on himself. His death has been described as . Police are among the agencies that responded. Officials have not released the identities of those killed or wounded beyond the age of the girl who died on . The figures above are current only to evening. If you or someone you know is struggling, the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is available 24 hours a day: call or text 988.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 211 Aug 2026, 03:19current

    Added the school named in New Zealand Herald reporting and its separate attribution of the toll of eight to Thailand's Health Ministry; noted officials have not released victims' identities.

  2. Version 111 Aug 2026, 00:27

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.