Two custodians killed in shooting at Chicago elementary school
Chicago Police reported two dead inside Mark Twain Elementary School on Aug. 10; no students were in the building.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Two Custodians Found Shot Dead In Elementary School | 98.7 FM WGIG1440wgig.iheart.com
- Two dead after shooting at a Chicago elementarykyma.com
- Two dead after shooting at a Chicago elementary schoolkyma.com
- Two Custodians Found Shot Dead In Elementary School | WTKSnewsradio1290wtks.iheart.com
- Two Custodians Found Shot Dead In Elementary School | The Patriot KEIB AM 1150patriotla.iheart.com
- Two Custodians Found Shot Dead In Elementary School | WCCF Radiowccfradio.iheart.com
- Two Custodians Found Shot Dead In Elementary School | 1490 WMRNwmrn.iheart.com
- Two Custodians Found Shot Dead In Elementary School | WTAGwtag.iheart.com
- Two Custodians Found Shot Dead In Elementary School | News Radio 570 WWNCwwnc.iheart.com
Revision history
- Version 712 Aug 2026, 03:24current
Added note on the differing location granularity between sources; no changes to casualty figures or attributions.
- Version 612 Aug 2026, 03:18
Added wccfradio.iheart.com and 1440wgig.iheart.com to the attributions for the custodians, the police-report casualty figure, the no-students detail and the suspect's status.
- Version 512 Aug 2026, 03:14
Added the 988 crisis line as the final line, corrected the Sun-Times name and made minor attribution edits; no new facts reported.
- Version 412 Aug 2026, 03:03
Added wtag.iheart.com and wmrn.iheart.com as corroborating sources for the death toll, the custodians' presence and the police account of the suspect's death.
- Version 312 Aug 2026, 03:00
Added patriotla.iheart.com as a fourth corroborating source for the casualty figure, suspect status and manner of death, and added the state to the location.
- Version 212 Aug 2026, 02:54
Added that both victims were custodians, their ages and how they were found, that no students were in the building with classes due Aug. 24, statements from the principal and SEIU Local 73, and the conflicting reports on the suspect's status and manner of death.
- Version 112 Aug 2026, 02:32
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.