Three Injured in Shooting at Charlottesville Wawa Parking Lot; Police Name Suspect
Charlottesville police said officers responded to reports of shots fired in the 5th Street convenience store lot at about 1:37 a.m. on Aug. 6.
More on this incident
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 37 Aug 2026, 14:38current
No new facts; headline and standfirst tightened to lead with the people affected and the official timeline.
- Version 27 Aug 2026, 14:38current
Headline and dek updated to reflect that police have named a suspect; no change to casualty figures or timeline.
- Version 27 Aug 2026, 12:48
Restructured to lead with the injured and the setting rather than the suspect, and added that officials have not released the identities of those hurt.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 19:28
First published.
- Version 16 Aug 2026, 19:30
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.