FirstAlerts

Excessive Heat Warning Issued for Las Vegas Valley Through Wednesday Evening

The National Weather Service warning takes effect at 10 a.m. Tuesday, June 11, 2019, and runs to 8 p.m. Wednesday, June 12, according to KTNV.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Jun 11, 2019, 7:12 a.m. ETWritten Aug 8, 2026, 8:28 p.m. ET

More on this incident

An is in effect for the Las Vegas valley and surrounding areas, KTNV reported. The station said the was issued by the . According to KTNV, the begins at 10 a.m. local time on Tuesday, June 11, 2019, and is set to expire at 8 p.m. local time on Wednesday, June 12, 2019. The alert carries a warning-level designation. The situation is developing. No temperature figures, forecast details or advisories beyond the timing and area of the were included in the reporting available for this story.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 19 Aug 2026, 00:34current

    First published.

  2. Version 19 Aug 2026, 00:28current

    First published.

  3. Version 19 Aug 2026, 00:28current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.