FirstAlerts

Red Flag Warning Issued for Santa Barbara County Mountains and South Coasts, Expiring Dec. 21

The National Weather Service warned of gusty winds and low humidity beginning 2017-12-20; the warning ends 2017-12-21 and is no longer in effect after that date.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Dec 20, 2017, 11:22 a.m. ETWritten Aug 8, 2026, 8:43 p.m. ET
The has issued a at the alert level for the Santa Barbara county mountains and south coasts, according to reporting by USA Today. The begins and ends . **When it lifts:** the expires on . It does not remain in force past that date, and readers reaching this report after should treat the hazard window as closed unless the has since issued a new . The cites gusty winds and low relative humidity over the Santa Barbara county mountains and south coasts. Northerly wind gusts were described as likely to exceed 40 mph, with isolated gusts up to 60 mph in the Santa Barbara County area on Wednesday afternoon, December 20. Winds were expected to increase in Ventura County on Thursday morning, December 21 — the final day of the period. No further details on conditions or impacts were available in the material reviewed for this report, and nothing in that material indicates the was extended beyond its end.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 19 Aug 2026, 00:43current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.