FirstAlerts

Weather Service Warns of Minor Tidal Overflow at San Diego County Beaches

The National Weather Service says tides above 7 feet could push water into low-lying beach areas, including parking lots, through Wednesday.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 10, 2026, 12:26 p.m. ETWritten Aug 10, 2026, 8:47 p.m. ET

More on this incident

Tides exceeding 7 feet can result in minor tidal overflow into low-lying areas along the beach, including beach parking lots, the said, as reported by KPBS. The advisory-level covers San Diego County beaches and runs from 6 p.m. Monday, Aug. 10, through 11 p.m. Wednesday, Aug. 12, according to the Weather Service. Astronomical high tides are expected to exceed 7 feet Monday through Wednesday between 8 and 9:30 p.m. The Weather Service said a surf forecast of only 2 to 3 feet is not expected to elevate tides further.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 111 Aug 2026, 00:54current

    First published.

  2. Version 111 Aug 2026, 00:47current

    First published.

  3. Version 111 Aug 2026, 00:27current

    First published.

  4. Version 111 Aug 2026, 00:50current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble β€” all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources β€” accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements β€” and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld β€” a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them β€” and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.