Central Florida Heat Advisory Extended to 8 p.m. Tuesday
The National Weather Service in Melbourne now has the advisory running from 11 a.m. to 8 p.m. on Aug. 11, a longer window than when it was first issued.
Hazard products are revised and cancelled as conditions change. Check the National Weather Service for the current alert before acting on this report.
More on this incident
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
- Orlando weather: Heat advisory, lower rain chances for Central Floridafox35orlando.com
- Heat advisory in place for Central Florida with feels-like temps that could hit 110orlandosentinel.com
- Advisory continues for east Central Florida thanks to heat waveorlandosentinel.com
- More heat, another advisory and showers possible in the afternoonorlandosentinel.com
- Heat advisory: Dangerous temps trigger alerts for nearly every Charlotte-region countywbtv.com
- Heat advisory: Scorching temps trigger alerts for nearly every Charlotte-region countywbtv.com
- Heat index climbs above 108 degrees in Central Florida; afternoon storms moving in wesh.com
- Heat Advisory continues across Central Florida as heat index could reach 110 degrees Thursdaywftv.com
Revision history
- Version 514 Aug 2026, 14:00current
Added WBTV's Aug. 14 advisory times (noon to 8 p.m.) and Gaston County, N.C. and Union County, S.C. to the listed areas.
- Version 413 Aug 2026, 14:00current
Added WFTV reporting: its 100-110 degree heat index range, its precautions guidance, and the additional "most of Central Florida" area listing.
- Version 413 Aug 2026, 15:23
No new facts on the record; added headline and standfirst, story text otherwise unchanged.
- Version 313 Aug 2026, 14:54
No new facts; added headline and dek summarizing the advisory areas and the reported heat index range.
- Version 313 Aug 2026, 12:24
Added later Orlando Sentinel reporting of a continuing advisory for East Central Florida on Aug. 13 (10 a.m.-8 p.m.) and a peak heat index of 112 degrees per NWS Melbourne; timing now presented as a sourced conflict rather than a single expiry.
- Version 213 Aug 2026, 14:49
No new facts; story reorganized to lead with the areas covered and the Weather Service impact statement, with the conflicting figures and timing retained as sourced ranges.
- Version 213 Aug 2026, 00:50
Deleted the sentence reprinting the raw ISO timestamps for the advisory's start and end. Restated the window in plain speech throughout ("from 11 a.m. until 8 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 11, 2026") and dropped the redundant "EDT" and full-date repetitions in the expiry paragraph and dek. All sourced heat-index figures, the conflict attribution to each outlet, the expiry warning and the full precaution list are unchanged.
- Version 112 Aug 2026, 00:22
First published.
- Version 113 Aug 2026, 14:44
First published.
- Version 112 Aug 2026, 00:10current
First published.
- Version 112 Aug 2026, 00:57current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.