FirstAlerts

Utah's Widemouth 2 Fire Listed at 121,225 Acres, 26% Containment

The cause is given as lightning. The record behind this account carries no date for the acreage and containment figures and no further detail on the incident.

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 11, 2026, 4:16 p.m. ETWritten Aug 15, 2026, 5:25 p.m. ET

More on this incident

A wildfire in designated the has burned and stands at , according to the source cited below. The cause of the fire is given as . That is the full extent of the information available for this account. The record does not give a date or time for the acreage and containment figures, does not identify the counties or communities involved, and says nothing about evacuations, damage, injuries, or the personnel and equipment assigned. This account makes no claim about those matters in either direction. Acreage and containment figures for wildfires are point-in-time measurements that change as fire behavior shifts and as mapping is revised. Because no timestamp accompanies the figures here, they should be read as a snapshot of unknown vintage rather than as a current status.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 115 Aug 2026, 21:29current

    First published.

  2. Version 115 Aug 2026, 21:25current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.