FirstAlerts

Teen Charged in Fatal Shooting of David Krause Near Milwaukee's Harbor District

Stallone D. Dailey faces felony murder and other charges in connection with the death of David Krause; the case is undecided.

2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 10:15 p.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Aug 20, 2026, 3:29 p.m. ETWritten Aug 20, 2026, 10:22 p.m. ET
Stallone D. Dailey, 15, has been in connection with the fatal shooting of David Krause near Milwaukee's Harbor District, according to CBS 58. The case is at the charging stage and remains undecided. Prosecutors allege Dailey, Tyler and another person chased Krause from a Sonata as part of an attempted robbery and assaulted him before Krause was fatally shot. Dailey faces charges of felony murder, operating a vehicle without the owner's consent as a knowing passenger, and arson of property other than a building as a party to a crime. As the case is only at the charging stage, it has not been decided; charges are allegations and Dailey is presumed innocent.

Earlier reports

  1. Aug 20, 2026, 10:15 p.m. ETFirst report

    15-Year-Old Charged in Fatal Shooting of David Krause Near Milwaukee's Harbor District

    A 15-year-old has been charged in connection with the fatal shooting of David Krause near Milwaukee's Harbor District, according to cbs58.com. Stallone D. Dailey is charged with felony murder, operating a vehicle without the owner's consent as a knowing passenger, and arson of property other than a building as a party to a crime, the outlet reported.

    Prosecutors allege that Dailey, Tyler, and another person chased Krause from a Sonata as part of an attempted robbery and assaulted him before Krause was fatally shot, according to cbs58.com. The felony murder charge carries a maximum possible sentence of 35 years in prison, the outlet reported.

    The charges are allegations, and Dailey is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The matter is at the charging stage and has not been decided; the case is ongoing.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 121 Aug 2026, 02:22current

    First published.

  2. Version 121 Aug 2026, 02:15current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.