Teen Charged in Yazoo City Shooting; Case Undecided
Darryn Love, 16, faces aggravated assault charges in a Yazoo City shooting; the case is at the charging stage and has not been resolved.
3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 2, 2026, 11:46 a.m. ET
Earlier reports
Sep 2, 2026, 11:50 a.m. ET
16-Year-Old Charged as Adult in Yazoo City Shooting; Case Not Yet Decided
Darryn Love, 16, has been charged as an adult with aggravated assault in connection with a shooting in Yazoo City, according to wtva.com. The charge stems from an incident in which the government alleges Love shot a victim twice, causing two gunshot wounds.
The Yazoo City Police Department is investigating the case. As of the latest report, the matter is only at the charging stage; no trial has occurred, and no plea has been entered. The case has not been decided by a court, and Love is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
Sep 2, 2026, 11:46 a.m. ETFirst report
16-year-old charged as adult in Yazoo City shooting; case undecided
A 16-year-old has been charged as an adult in connection with a shooting in Yazoo City, according to WTVA. The case is undecided.
Darryn Love is charged with aggravated assault, the outlet reported. Police allege Love shot a victim twice, causing two gunshot wounds.
The Yazoo City Police Department is investigating. The shooting occurred on a date that has not been established in available reports.
As the case is at the charging stage, the charges are allegations, and Love is presumed innocent unless proven guilty. The matter has not been resolved.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 15:50current
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 15:46current
First published.
- Version 12 Sept 2026, 15:52current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.