49ers Owner Jed York Pleads No Contest; Faces Up to One Day in Jail
Jed York pleaded no contest to disorderly conduct and possession of criminal tools on Monday, Aug. 24, 2026, and faces a possible one-day jail term, according to reports.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 24, 2026, 12:51 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 24, 2026, 12:52 p.m. ET
49ers Owner Jed York Pleads No Contest to Two Misdemeanor Charges in Ohio
Jed York, owner of the San Francisco 49ers, pleaded no contest Monday, Aug. 24, to charges of disorderly conduct and possessing criminal tools, according to boston.com. The statutory maximum for both offenses is one day in jail, to be served concurrently, and he was credited with one day served. He also was fined $1,150.
York was arrested Sunday in East Palestine, Ohio, and was released after posting a $5,000 bond, boston.com reported. The charges stem from the arrest; further details of the alleged conduct were not provided in the report.
Aug 24, 2026, 12:51 p.m. ETFirst report
49ers Owner Jed York Pleads No Contest to Two Misdemeanor Charges in Ohio
Jed York, owner of the San Francisco 49ers, pleaded no contest Monday, Aug. 24, 2026, to two misdemeanor charges in East Palestine, Ohio, according to boston.com. The charges were disorderly conduct and possessing criminal tools.
York was arrested Sunday and released after posting a $5,000 bond. The statutory maximum for the offenses is one day in jail, to be served concurrently, and he was credited with one day served. He also was fined $1,150, boston.com reported.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 124 Aug 2026, 17:17current
First published.
- Version 124 Aug 2026, 16:51current
First published.
- Version 124 Aug 2026, 17:20
First published.
- Version 124 Aug 2026, 16:52current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.