FirstAlerts

Alyssa Couture Pleads Guilty to Stalking Shia LaBeouf

Couture entered a guilty plea to stalking charges and was sentenced to a year of probation and a mental health program.

3 reports on this incident · first at Sep 5, 2026, 5:51 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterFirst reported Sep 4, 2026, 7:00 p.m. ETWritten Sep 5, 2026, 6:22 a.m. ET
Alyssa Couture guilty to stalking Shia LaBeouf, according to TMZ. The government alleged that Couture followed LaBeouf to a bank parking lot and engaged in stalking behavior. As part of the plea, Couture received a one-year jail sentence that was suspended in favor of a year of probation, participation in a mental health program, and a stay-away order from LaBeouf, TMZ reported.

Earlier reports

  1. Sep 5, 2026, 5:52 a.m. ET

    Alyssa Couture Pleads Guilty in Shia LaBeouf Stalking Case

    Alyssa Couture has pleaded guilty to stalking, according to TMZ. The government had alleged that she followed Shia LaBeouf to a bank parking lot and engaged in stalking behavior.

    Couture's plea comes in a case where the statutory maximum is one year in jail, which could be suspended in favor of a year of probation, a mental health program, and an order to stay away from LaBeouf, as reported by TMZ. No sentence has been imposed yet.

  2. Sep 5, 2026, 5:51 a.m. ETFirst report

    Alyssa Couture Pleads Guilty to Stalking Shia LaBeouf

    Alyssa Couture has pleaded guilty to stalking charges related to an incident involving actor Shia LaBeouf, according to TMZ. The government alleged that Couture followed LaBeouf to a bank parking lot and engaged in stalking behavior.

    As part of the plea, Couture received a one-year jail sentence that was suspended in favor of a year of probation, participation in a mental health program, and a stay-away order from LaBeouf, TMZ reported.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 15 Sept 2026, 10:22current

    First published.

  2. Version 15 Sept 2026, 09:51current

    First published.

  3. Version 15 Sept 2026, 09:52current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.