FirstAlerts

Atlanta Woman Sentenced in Amazon Fraud and Forgery Case

Brittany Hudson was sentenced to prison on August 10, 2026, after pleading guilty to charges including stealing nearly $10 million from Amazon and forging a former judge's signature.

3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 20, 2026, 8:59 a.m. ET

By AI ReporterWritten Sep 2, 2026, 11:41 a.m. ET
Brittany Hudson was to prison on August 10, 2026, in the after pleading guilty to charges including stealing nearly $10 million from Amazon, forging the signature of a former U.S. district judge on a fake court document, bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft, according to wsbradio.com. Reports on the length of the sentence conflict: wsbradio.com reported both and . The outlet also reported conflicting accounts of the scheme's method: one account said Hudson and her partner allegedly used fake vendors and invoices to steal the money from January to June of 2022, while another said the government claimed Shamarri Brooks, 34, of Stone Mountain, used his music and social media presence to recruit people with existing bank accounts to help deposit stolen checks. The case was investigated by the FBI, according to wsbradio.com. Sentencing details beyond the conflicting reports have not been clarified.

Earlier reports

  1. Sep 2, 2026, 11:36 a.m. ET

    Atlanta Woman Sentenced in Amazon Fraud and Forgery Case

    Brittany Hudson was sentenced to prison on August 10, 2026, in the Northern District of Georgia, according to wsbradio.com. The outlet reported that Hudson and her partner allegedly used fake vendors and invoices to steal the money from January to June of 2022, and are accused of forging the signature of a former U.S. district judge on a fake court document. The charges included stealing nearly $10 million from Amazon, bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft.

    Reports on the length of the sentence conflict: wsbradio.com reported both six years in federal prison followed by five years of supervised release, and 16 years in federal prison. The FBI investigated the case. The exact sentence imposed has not been clarified by the sources.

  2. Aug 20, 2026, 8:59 a.m. ETFirst report

    Georgia Man Convicted of Laundering Over $2.7 Million Stolen in Online Fraud Schemes

    According to official records released on 2026-08-10 by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Georgia, Babajide Adesayo, 41, of Douglasville, Georgia, was convicted by a federal jury on August 6, 2026, for laundering over $2.7 million stolen from victims of online fraud.

    Adesayo was found guilty of two counts of conspiracy to commit money laundering and sixteen counts of transactional money laundering following an eight-day trial in federal district court. He is currently awaiting sentencing.

    Court records show that between April 2020 and September 2021, online fraudsters targeted elderly victims through romance and business scams, directing them to transfer funds to business accounts owned by co-defendant Efemena Igbe, a Nigerian national. Igbe transferred the funds to Adesayo under false notations claiming the money was for purchasing vehicles from Adesayo's automotive business. Adesayo then siphoned the funds to overseas accounts in China, Hong Kong, Nigeria, and other countries over a 17-month period.

    Following his June 2024 arrest, Adesayo was released on bond without bail but continued laundering stolen money while on release. A federal magistrate judge revoked his bond after the conduct was discovered, and Adesayo has been held in federal custody since March 2, 2026.

    U.S. Attorney Theodore S. Hertzberg stated, "Adesayo was a key member of a complex, transnational network that preyed upon elderly victims and siphoned their retirement savings overseas, mainly to China, Hong Kong, and Nigeria, to make recovery impossible." U.S. Attorney Hertzberg added that Adesayo continued laundering funds even after being indicted and released on bond.

    Marlo Graham, Special Agent in Charge of FBI Atlanta, noted that Adesayo helped steal millions from vulnerable victims and moved money overseas to conceal it.

    Steven N. Schrank, Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Investigations in Georgia and Alabama, stated that Adesayo's conviction shows financial facilitators who move illicit proceeds for transnational fraud networks will be held accountable.

    Sentencing is scheduled for November 20, 2026, at 1:30 p.m., before United States District Judge Mark H. Cohen.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 12 Sept 2026, 15:36current

    First published.

  2. Version 120 Aug 2026, 12:59current

    First published.

  3. Version 12 Sept 2026, 15:41current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.