Bronx Man Charged With Assault and Criminal Mischief as Hate Crimes
Larry Montes, 46, faces two counts of assault as a hate crime and one count of criminal mischief as a hate crime, plus other charges, in a case announced on August 15, 2026. The record names the NYPD as investigating agency and gives no account of the alleged conduct. Montes is presumed innocent.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 15, 2026, 8:29 p.m. ET
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 18, 2026, 1:38 a.m. ET — checked 7h ago.
Earlier reports
Aug 15, 2026, 8:40 p.m. ET
Bronx Man Charged With Hate Crimes Over Central Synagogue Incident; Case Undecided
Officials announced on August 15, 2026, that Larry Montes, 46, of the Bronx, has been charged following an incident during Friday evening Shabbat services at Central Synagogue at 652 Lexington Avenue in Manhattan, according to fox5ny.com and abc7ny.com. The case has not been decided. It is at the charging stage, and nothing in the available record shows any resolution.
Montes faces two counts of assault as a hate crime, criminal mischief as a hate crime, one count of criminal mischief as a hate crime, and other charges, the two outlets reported.
The matter remains undecided. No court has ruled on the accusations, no verdict, plea, dismissal or other outcome has been reported, and readers should not infer one. The charges are accusations, and Montes is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court, fox5ny.com reported.
Accounts from authorities differ on the sequence of events, and neither version can be treated as settled. According to abc7ny.com, NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch said that as security was removing Montes from Central Synagogue during Shabbat services, he struck a 63-year-old woman, damaged synagogue property, and spit at and headbutted a member of the security team. According to fox5ny.com, police said Montes entered the synagogue during Shabbat services Friday evening, struck a member of the congregation, damaged synagogue property, and, as synagogue security escorted him from the building, spat at and headbutted a security team member.
The investigating agency is the NYPD, identified in the reporting as the New York Police Department, both outlets reported.
As of the August 15, 2026 announcement, the only stage this matter had reached was the filing of charges. Anyone encountering this account later should treat the case as unresolved unless a subsequent, sourced outcome says otherwise.
Aug 15, 2026, 8:29 p.m. ETFirst report
Bronx Man Charged With Hate Crimes After Central Synagogue Incident
Larry Montes, 46, of the Bronx, has been charged with multiple hate crime offenses in connection with an incident at Central Synagogue in Manhattan during Friday evening Shabbat services, officials announced on August 15, 2026, according to reporting from FOX5NY and ABC7NY.
Montes faces two counts of assault as a hate crime, criminal mischief as a hate crime, one count of criminal mischief as a hate crime, and other charges, the two outlets reported.
The matter is at the charging stage only. No court has resolved it, no plea or verdict has been reported, and the outcome is undecided. The charges are accusations; FOX5NY noted that Montes is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court.
Accounts of what happened differ, and neither has been tested in court. According to ABC7NY, NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch said that as security was removing Montes from Central Synagogue at 652 Lexington Avenue during Shabbat services, he struck a 63-year-old woman, damaged synagogue property, and spit at and headbutted a member of the security team. FOX5NY reported that police said Montes entered Central Synagogue during Shabbat services Friday evening, struck a member of the congregation, damaged synagogue property, and, as synagogue security escorted him from the building, spat at and headbutted a security team member.
The New York Police Department is the investigating agency.
As of the announcement, the case had not been adjudicated and remains open.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 116 Aug 2026, 00:29current
First published.
- Version 117 Aug 2026, 03:25current
First published.
- Version 116 Aug 2026, 00:40current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.