FirstAlerts

Brooklyn Man Sentenced to 87 Months in Alabama Debit Card Fraud Scheme

A U.S. Attorney's Office announcement dated August 14, 2026 says Eric Kendrie Shuler was sentenced for conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud and aggravated identity theft over roughly $214,757 in unauthorized ATM withdrawals.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 15, 2026, 10:57 a.m. ET
Developing

This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.

A press release issued by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Alabama on August 14, 2026 states that Eric Kendrie Shuler, 34, of Brooklyn, New York, was on August 12, 2026 to 87 months in federal prison for conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. According to the announcement by U.S. Attorney Thomas Govan, Shuler will also serve three years of supervised release; the release notes there is no parole in the federal system. According to the office's account of Shuler's plea agreement and other court documents, in the fall of 2024 Shuler and co-defendant Kyara Ivelisse Rosario-Berenguer, 30, of Reading, Pennsylvania, conspired to illegally obtain debit cards and associated account information belonging to members of a local credit union, then used them to make approximately 201 unauthorized ATM withdrawals in and around Montgomery, Alabama, totaling $214,757. The release states that at their respective plea hearings both defendants admitted that on a single day in September 2024 they used unlawfully obtained cards and account information to make 138 ATM withdrawals totaling $190,250. The office's account states that on September 8, 2024, officers with the Prattville Police Department spotted the two and attempted to make contact, and that both fled in a vehicle. During the pursuit, according to the release, Shuler maneuvered around numerous vehicles at high speeds, swapped lanes recklessly, drove on the wrong side of the road, ran red lights, and reached speeds of at least 140 mph on Interstates 65 and 85. The release says the pursuit ended when Shuler's vehicle collided with a guardrail near the Perry Hill Road exit on I-85 in Montgomery, and that he continued to resist arrest after the crash before being taken into custody. The release states Shuler pleaded guilty on April 28, 2026, and was ordered to pay $214,757 in restitution jointly and severally with Rosario-Berenguer, meaning the two are collectively responsible for the full amount. Rosario-Berenguer previously pleaded guilty to aggravated identity theft and was on May 28, 2026 to 24 months in federal prison, with the same restitution obligation, according to the office. The U.S. Secret Service and the Prattville Police Department investigated the case, with assistance from the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency and the Montgomery Police Department, the release says. Assistant U.S. Attorney Joel Feil prosecuted. This account is drawn entirely from the prosecuting office's public announcement, and the matter remains a developing story; no other filings or responses are reflected here.

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 115 Aug 2026, 14:57current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble β€” all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources β€” accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements β€” and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld β€” a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them β€” and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.