Chinese National Charged With Federal Voter Fraud in Massachusetts
Yupeng Sun is charged with fraudulent voter registration and fraudulent voting tied to the 2024 presidential election; the case is at the charging stage and no court has decided it.
3 reports on this incident · first at Aug 19, 2026, 3:54 p.m. ET
Earlier reports
Aug 19, 2026, 4:28 p.m. ET
Chinese National Charged with Voter Fraud in Massachusetts
According to official court records from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts, 33-year-old Chinese national Yupeng Sun of Andover, Massachusetts, was arrested on August 19, 2026. Sun was charged with one count of fraudulent voter registration and one count of fraudulent voting. The charges are allegations and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law; the matter remains undecided.
Official records allege that on October 10, 2024, Sun submitted an online voter registration through the Secretary of the Commonwealth's website while impersonating another Chinese national residing in Massachusetts with legal permanent resident status. On October 31, 2024, Sun allegedly submitted an early voting ballot under the victim's identity at Malden City Hall for the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Sun also allegedly submitted anonymous tips in April and May 2026 to Homeland Security Investigations and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) reporting that the victim had illegally voted.
Court filings further allege that in April 2024, Sun submitted fraudulent forms to USCIS requesting to abandon the legal permanent resident status of the same Chinese national and his wife. When the couple returned from an international trip in June 2024, they were subjected to secondary inspection at Logan Airport in Boston, had their Green Cards confiscated, and were placed into removal proceedings as a result of the fraudulent submissions.
Each charge carries a maximum sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of $250,000, with the defendant subject to deportation upon completion of any sentence. United States Attorney Leah Foley and Jeff Grimming, Acting Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Investigations in New England, announced the charges, which are being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney James J. Nagelberg.
Aug 19, 2026, 3:54 p.m. ETFirst report
Chinese National Charged with Voter Fraud in Massachusetts
This is a developing matter and the case remains undecided. On August 19, 2026, federal prosecutors announced criminal charges against 33-year-old Chinese national Yupeng Sun, who resides in Andover, Massachusetts. According to official court documents from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts, Sun was arrested and charged with one count of fraudulent voter registration and one count of fraudulent voting. The charges contained in the court filings are allegations, and Sun is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
According to official charging documents, Sun allegedly submitted an online voter registration on Oct. 10, 2024, through the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s website by impersonating another Chinese national residing in Massachusetts with legal permanent resident status. Court filings state that on Oct. 31, 2024, Sun allegedly impersonated the victim to submit an early voting ballot at Malden City Hall for the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Official records state that Sun later submitted anonymous tips in April and May 2026 to Homeland Security Investigations and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services stating that the victim "illegally voted in the 2024 U.S. presidential election" and noting that "[h]e is not a U.S. citizen but a permanent resident."
Charging documents further state that in April 2024, Sun allegedly impersonated the same Chinese national and his wife in fraudulent forms submitted to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services requesting to abandon their legal permanent resident status. When the couple returned from an international trip in June 2024, they were subjected to secondary inspection at Logan Airport in Boston, had their Green Cards confiscated, and were placed into removal proceedings as a result of the fraudulent forms. United States Attorney Leah Foley and Jeff Grimming, Acting Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Investigations in New England, announced the charges, which are being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney James J. Nagelberg. Each charge carries a sentence of up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of $250,000.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 20:28current
First published.
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 19:54current
First published.
- Version 119 Aug 2026, 21:49current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.