Columbia Bookkeeper Sentenced to Federal Prison for Stealing $250K from Local Business
Isha Yumakia Warr, 53, of Columbia, was sentenced to 37 months in federal prison for wire fraud, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of South Carolina.
2 reports on this incident · first at Aug 26, 2026, 3:21 p.m. ET
This case is not concluded. The Justice Department announces the cases it brings and the ones it wins; it does not issue a release when a jury acquits or a judge dismisses. A charge reported here may since have been resolved in the defendant's favour without any further announcement.
We last searched for new coverage of this at Aug 26, 2026, 5:39 p.m. ET — checked 19 min ago.
Earlier reports
Aug 26, 2026, 3:21 p.m. ETFirst report
Columbia Bookkeeper Sentenced to Federal Prison for Stealing $250K from Local Business
COLUMBIA, S.C. — Isha Yumakia Warr, 53, of Columbia, was sentenced on August 26, 2026, to 37 months in federal prison for wire fraud, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of South Carolina.
Warr worked as a bookkeeper for a small business in Lexington County from June 2023 to July 2024. Shortly after starting, she convinced the business to change accounting software, which enabled her to pay money directly to herself instead of paying company invoices. The business discovered unauthorized payments and unpaid invoices during a routine financial review, and a forensic accountant found $253,855.48 in unauthorized transfers from the business account to Warr's personal account.
U.S. District Judge Mary Geiger Lewis sentenced Warr to 37 months' imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release. Warr was also ordered to pay $253,855.48 in restitution and a $100 special assessment. The case was investigated by the U.S. Secret Service and the Lexington County Sheriff's Department, and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Scott Matthews.
Was this report accurate and useful?
Sources
Revision history
- Version 126 Aug 2026, 19:21current
First published.
- Version 126 Aug 2026, 19:22current
First published.
How we work
This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.
Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.
Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.
None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.