FirstAlerts

Evans Man Pleads Guilty to Federal Child Pornography Charges

Ryan Thomas Manley, 44, awaits sentencing after pleading guilty in federal court to production and possession charges.

By AI ReporterWritten Aug 20, 2026, 9:20 a.m. ET

According to official records released on August 11, 2026, by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia, Ryan Thomas Manley, 44, of Evans, Georgia, pled guilty in federal district court to six counts of Production with Intent to Distribute Child Pornography and one count of Possession of Child Pornography, announced Margaret E. “Meg” Heap, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia.

As described in the plea agreement, from January to February 2025, Manley produced morphed images of real minor victims with intent to distribute sexually explicit conduct through electronic means. The guilty plea subjects Manley to a statutory penalty of up to 15 years imprisonment for the six counts of Production with Intent to Distribute Child Pornography and up to 20 years imprisonment for Possession of Child Pornography. Additional penalties include substantial fines, sex offender registration, and a maximum life term of supervised release upon completion of any prison term, with no parole in the federal system.

“The children depicted in this CSAM case are not anonymous victims; they are real children whose suffering will continue long after this defendant is incarcerated,” said U.S. Attorney Heap. “Today’s guilty plea is a reminder that every child deserves justice, dignity, and protection. This office along with our law enforcement partners, are committed to investigate and prosecute those who possess or produce CSAM.”

“By receiving and intending to distribute these images, Manley participated in the continuing abuse and exploitation of children,” said Supervisory Senior Special Agent Matt Ploskunak of FBI Atlanta’s Augusta Resident Agency. “Children must be protected from sexual exploitation, and we remain committed to investigating the possession and distribution of child pornography.”

The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Columbia County Sheriff's Office, and prosecuted for the United States by Southern District of Georgia Assistant U.S. Attorney Tara M. Lyons. Information regarding victims of child exploitation can be reported to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children Cyber Tipline at report.cybertip.org or 1-800-THE-LOST (1-800-843-5678).

Was this report accurate and useful?

Sources

Revision history

  1. Version 120 Aug 2026, 13:20current

    First published.

How we work

This site models an investigative reporter rather than a wire desk. The aim is the most complete, accurate and timely account we can assemble — all three, not a trade between them. Reports go out within minutes of the coverage they are built from, carrying context a newsroom would otherwise need a day and a records request to gather: what has happened at this place before, what the operator’s record is, which aircraft it actually was.

Reports are built from primary sources — accident and court records, official registries, weather observations, agency statements — and from reputable news organisations, each named where their reporting is used. Facts are extracted before anything is written, and every one must be supported by a quotation found in the source itself; the model that writes the report is given only those verified facts and never sees the article, so it cannot introduce a detail no source stated.

Where sources disagree we publish the disagreement, attributed, rather than picking a figure. Where a fact comes from a record rather than a reporter, we say so, and the language matches: an instrument reading is never described as something anyone confirmed. Some things are deliberately withheld — a suspect is not named until an agency names them on the record, victims until families or officials release them — and corrections appear as visible revisions, never as silent edits.

None of that makes a report true. A quotation check proves a source said something, not that it was right, and an automated system can be confidently wrong in ways the checks do not catch. If something here is wrong, the feedback above is how it gets found. The full methodology, including what we refuse to publish.